Join The webinar

Be a part of this free webinar on Ob/Gyn Coding challenges and get your biggest questions answered.

Lisa Maciejewski-West
CMC, CMOM, CMIS, MCS-P

Register Now

Medical Billing Services | Medical Billing Company Checklist

The EMR Billing Specialists

  • Home
  • Services
  • Payments
  • Company
  • Contact

ACO Wars – Pioneer vs Shared Savings Programs

July 3, 2013 by Ango Mark Leave a Comment

ACO

Well, it is not a war in the strictest sense of the term, but it does denote the recent developments in the ACO or Accountable Care Organization scene where many Pioneer ACOs have been opting out of the program due to difficulties in meeting the targets and the high risks involved.  About 25% of the Pioneer registered Accountable Care Organizations are in the process of exiting the program and joining the lower-risk option, the Shared Savings Program.   CMS had this to say about the fallout :

 “We’re encouraged that these organizations want to continue in programs that promote better care at lower costs, we fully anticipated that as these programs get up and running, some organizations would shift between models.” 

Health Reforms & ACOs

 For those of you, who have been too busy to register what an ACO exactly is, it is a category of CMS program, which is part of the government health reform, which includes others like Patient Centered Medical Home, Medical Neighborhood, Health Home, etc.  The reforms themselves consist of three main components, which is a superset of any practice models.  They are :

a. Care Delivery Reforms.

b. Payment Reforms.

c.  Health and Healthcare Community Reform.

 ACO is a model which is, to quote a popular definition, “an organization, virtual or real that agrees to take on the responsibility for providing care for a particular population while achieving specified quality objectives and constraining costs.”

 As the above definition clearly points out, an ACO platform is expected to stimulate more integrated care for the patients, which would ultimately result in quality improvements and healthcare cost reduction.  Also, in these programs the ACO gets a share in the costs ultimately saved.

Pioneer vs Shared Savings Programs

 SSP and Pioneer were two landmark ACO programs created by CMS.  The latter has a slightly complex format, which takes into consideration organizations that already have some experience in providing coordinated care.

 The Main Differences between the two are:

 1.  SSP has two payments tracks and it is upto to the ACO to choose either the non-risk sharing one (which has less cost savings share) and the risk-sharing track (which has higher cost savings share but at the same time there are possibilities of losses upto even 60%).

 2.  The Pioneer utilizes a trending methodology that, all other things being equal, produces a slightly higher benchmark than the SSP for high-cost areas.

 3.  The SSP will need to cater to at least 5,000 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, whereas the Pioneer needs to service 15,000.

 4.  The Pioneer program importantly includes a clause that 50% of Pioneer ACOs revenues should come from participating in “risk” contracts with other non-CMS  (private) payers.

 The Significance of events such as the above

Republicans have been ardently opposing the health reforms (which is really an attempt for universal healthcare).  The recent refusal by the National Football League to team up with the government to promote ObamaCare has been touted as some sort of vindication for their stance.  Also, the refusal of some states to adopt the Medicaid expansion plan and the setting up of online HIE, to realize the goal of “healthcare for all” , is seen as further supporting evidence.   And the above developments in the Pioneer ACO scene is construed by some health reform detractors as the “straw that will break the ACO camel’s back”.

 MedicalBillingStar :  A Voice of Sanity

 With a decade of hands-on experience in servicing over 500 clients when it comes to the RCM Cycle, MedicalBillingStar always endeavors to float above the cacophony of healthcare gossips and half-truths, to provide their medical billing and coding clients with information that is relevant, besides of course catering to their entire RCM workflow.   We are aware of the impact that ACO’s will have on payment models, the changes from which ultimately have to be incorporated into the RCM process.  Thus, we keep abreast of the latest happenings in the payment model scene.  Meanwhile you may call MedicalBillingStar at 877-272-1572 or visit our website at www.medicalbillingstar.com if you any questions about any of the above or the Medical Billing/Coding processes in general.

Filed Under: 2013, ACO, Medical Billing, Medical Coding, Medicare, Revenue cycle management Tagged With: accountable care organizations, ACO, Healthcare reforms, Medical Billing, Medical Coding, RCM

Complicated Crosswalks, More Codes And Stricter Documentation Requirements. But ICD 10 Is Not The Loch Ness Monster !

May 15, 2013 by Ango Mark Leave a Comment

Are you ready to get cracking on ICD 10 ?

The deadline for adopting ICD 10 is inching a little closer every day ! It is time for the eternal question. Are you prepared? A study by the Health Revenue Assurance Associates says that 20% of medical practices are yet to start an education or training program on ICD 10.

About half of the medical practices surveyed were way behind timelines set by Medicare and Medicaid. The transition is going to be tough. No matter what mild mannered, reassuring experts say ! And that is why the sooner a practice makes the switch, the better.

Confounding crosswalks…

Medical practitioners who think cross-walking ICD 9 codes with the latest codes is just a matter of few mouse clicks, have a second think coming. The General Equivalence Mappings does offer a detailed crosswalk of both the coding systems.

But the fact that there are very few one to one matches between both coding sets is going to make the transition, tricky.

According to a study by researchers from the University of Michigan and Illinois, mappings for specialists are going to be, especially, complex. Emphasis has to be laid on understanding and managing, mapping categories and networks.

ICD-10-Crosswalk

A little bit of effort from everybody…

It isn’t the coding or billing team alone that is going to struggle with the new codes. It is going to take a bit of effort from all concerned.

As ICD 10 is all about greater specificity and granularity, physicians will have to focus more on the medical documentation they send to the billing team. More documentation could mean just one thing, more revenue !

Have you forgotten your insurer ?

Well, your insurer is a part of your team as well. Ask for a testing plan and send a few “test” claims to the insurer. Coordinate with your payers to make sure you are ready for the D day. Keep in mind that you cannot send ICD 10 claims till the compliance date. But don’t let that stop you, from sending out trial claims, to payers.

Why ICD 10 is not the Loch Ness monster, after all !

The entire hullabaloo surrounding ICD 10 makes the codes look like small, poisonous creatures, out to get physicians. In the long run ICD 10 can prove to be good for practices. It could mean more accurate payment for medical procedures. Fewer miscoded claims. And, a better idea of how much you’d be paid, prior, to a medical treatment.

Filed Under: 2013, 2014, ICD-10, Medical Coding Tagged With: Healthcare, ICD 10, ICD-10 Certified Coders, ICD-10 Crosswalk, ICD-9, Medical Coding, Physicians

Get Updates

Leave your email address here & Receive our latest blogs and infographics to your inbox!

RESOURCE

Most Popular

  • Why do independent practices fail when outsourcing RCM and billing to EHR companies?
  • Hospitals outsource revenue cycle management to meet value based payment initiatives [infographics]
  • How to prepare for MIPS in 2018 [QPP Year 2]
  • 4 Thoughts on conducting a successful RCM Audits [Infographic]
  • Experts Reveal the Unknown Facts of MACRA & RCM Challenges [Infographic]

Categories

  • 2013
  • 2014
  • ACO
  • Anesthesiology
  • Business Intelligence tools
  • CFO'S Corner
  • Dictastar App
  • EHR
  • EMR
  • General
  • Healthcare IT Trends
  • HIPAA
  • ICD-10
  • MACRA
  • Meaningful use
  • Medical Billing
  • Medical Billing Company
  • Medical Billing Company Checklist
  • Medical Billing Company Reviews
  • Medical Coding
  • Medical Practice
  • Medicare
  • obamacare
  • payer contract negotiation
  • Physician Credentialing
  • physicians
  • Revenue cycle management

Tags

Affordable Care Act EHR EHR Billing Company EHR Implementation EHR vendor Electronic Medical Records Company EMR EMR billing Services EMR medical billing company Free Physician Credentialing Services Healthcare Healthcare Claims Processing Services healthcare physicians ICD-10 Medical Coding ICD-10 Medical Coding Services ICD 10 Meaningful Use Meaningful use of stage 2 final rule Medical Billing Medical Billing Companies Medical Billing Payments Medical Billing Reports Medical Billing Services Medical Coding Company Medical Coding Services Medical Practice Medical Practices Medicare Medicare Billing Company Medicare Billing Services Obamacare Patient engagement Patient Portal Physician Billing Services Physician Credentialing for New Practice Physician Practice Billing Company Physician Practice Billing Services Physicians Physicians billing Company Physicians billing EMR services Physicians billing services physicians EHR Revenue cycle Management Revenue Cycle Management Process Revenue Cycle Management Services

Join on twitter

Tweets by @medbillingstars

Copyright © MedicalBillingStar.com 2014 ·| Privacy Policy

11517, Belvedere Ct, Cerritos, California - 90703, United States